20261001 14082800 1.0 FALSE Westminster_LandscapeTypology_FINAL_20260929 002 Projected GCS_NAD_1983_2011 Linear Unit: Foot_US (0.304801) NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_Colorado_Central_FIPS_0502_Ft_US <ProjectedCoordinateSystem xsi:type='typens:ProjectedCoordinateSystem' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance' xmlns:xs='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' xmlns:typens='http://www.esri.com/schemas/ArcGIS/3.6.0'><WKT>PROJCRS[&quot;NAD_1983_2011_StatePlane_Colorado_Central_FIPS_0502_Ft_US&quot;,BASEGEOGCRS[&quot;GCS_NAD_1983_2011&quot;,DYNAMIC[FRAMEEPOCH[2010.0],MODEL[&quot;HTDP&quot;]],DATUM[&quot;D_NAD_1983_2011&quot;,ELLIPSOID[&quot;GRS_1980&quot;,6378137.0,298.257222101],ANCHOREPOCH[2010.0]],PRIMEM[&quot;Greenwich&quot;,0.0],CS[ellipsoidal,2],AXIS[&quot;Latitude (lat)&quot;,north,ORDER[1]],AXIS[&quot;Longitude (lon)&quot;,east,ORDER[2]],ANGLEUNIT[&quot;Degree&quot;,0.0174532925199433]],CONVERSION[&quot;Lambert_Conformal_Conic&quot;,METHOD[&quot;Lambert_Conformal_Conic&quot;],PARAMETER[&quot;False_Easting&quot;,3000000.000316083,LENGTHUNIT[&quot;Foot_US&quot;,0.3048006096012192]],PARAMETER[&quot;False_Northing&quot;,999999.999996,LENGTHUNIT[&quot;Foot_US&quot;,0.3048006096012192]],PARAMETER[&quot;Central_Meridian&quot;,-105.5],PARAMETER[&quot;Standard_Parallel_1&quot;,38.45],PARAMETER[&quot;Standard_Parallel_2&quot;,39.75],PARAMETER[&quot;Latitude_Of_Origin&quot;,37.83333333333334]],CS[Cartesian,2],AXIS[&quot;Easting (X)&quot;,east,ORDER[1]],AXIS[&quot;Northing (Y)&quot;,north,ORDER[2]],LENGTHUNIT[&quot;Foot_US&quot;,0.3048006096012192],ID[&quot;EPSG&quot;,&quot;6428&quot;]]</WKT><XOrigin>-118767900</XOrigin><YOrigin>-94525500</YOrigin><XYScale>3048.0060960121928</XYScale><ZOrigin>-100000</ZOrigin><ZScale>10000</ZScale><MOrigin>-100000</MOrigin><MScale>10000</MScale><XYTolerance>0.0032808333333333331</XYTolerance><ZTolerance>0.001</ZTolerance><MTolerance>0.001</MTolerance><HighPrecision>true</HighPrecision><WKID>103013</WKID><LatestWKID>6428</LatestWKID></ProjectedCoordinateSystem> 20260929 08030000 20261001 10551400 150000000 5000 FGDC Esri ArcGIS 13.6.3.59530 Westminster Landscape Typology 2026-07-31T00:00:00 2026-09-01T00:00:00 Arian Hampel City of Westminster Open Spaces This dataset should be used as a reference for various landscape types and their conditions within Westminster Open Spaces to inform maintenance prioritization. <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>This dataset is a polygon representation of open spaces maintained by the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Libraries in the City of Westminster, classified by landscape types.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV> City of Westminster Open Space Westminster Colorado Natural Resource Assessment Ecological Function Landscapes -105.110037 -104.734005 39.825192 39.612661 Contains the extent of all Westminster Open Spaces as of June 2026 2026-04-01T00:00:00 2026-09-30T00:00:00 Joshua Eldridge Matrix Design Group Denver CO 80202 US 3035720200 <DIV STYLE="text-align:Left;"><DIV><DIV><P><SPAN>ACCESS CONSTRAINTS: This dataset is provided as read-only and is restricted to City of Westminster employees and those who City of Westminster approves to access this dataset. Contact City of Westminster for more information on distribution requirements/restrictions. USE CONSTRAINTS: City of Westminster is not responsible and shall not be liable to the user for damages of any kind arising out of the use of data or information provided by City of Westminster, including the installation of the data or information, its use, or the results obtained from its use. ANY DATA OR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITY OF WESTMINSTER IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Data or information provided by City of Westminster shall be used and relied upon only at the user's sole risk, and the user agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City of Westminster, its officials, officers, and employees from any liability arising out of the use of the data/information provided. NOT FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES.</SPAN></P></DIV></DIV></DIV> ACCESS CONSTRAINTS: This dataset is provided as read-only and is restricted to City of Westminster employees and those who City of Westminster approves to access this dataset. Contact City of Westminster for more information on distribution requirements/restrictions. USE CONSTRAINTS: City of Westminster is not responsible and shall not be liable to the user for damages of any kind arising out of the use of data or information provided by City of Westminster, including the installation of the data or information, its use, or the results obtained from its use. ANY DATA OR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CITY OF WESTMINSTER IS PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Data or information provided by City of Westminster shall be used and relied upon only at the user's sole risk, and the user agrees to indemnify and hold harmless City of Westminster, its officials, officers, and employees from any liability arising out of the use of the data/information provided. NOT FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES. File Geodatabase Feature Class dataset EPSG 8.2.10(10.3.1) 0 Simple FALSE 0 TRUE FALSE Westminster_LandscapeTypology_FINAL_20260929 Feature Class 0 Contains all landscape and scoring information for all Open Spaces Field Data & Aerial Data OBJECTID OBJECTID OID 4 0 0 Internal feature number. Esri Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. Shape Shape Geometry 0 0 0 Feature geometry. Esri Coordinates defining the features. GIS_ACRES GIS_ACRES Double 8 0 0 Area size in U.S. Survey Acres calculated using GIS tools City of Westminster FORMAL_NAME FORMAL_NAME String 50 0 0 Formal Name of open spaces throughout the City of Westminster City of Westminster Classification Classification String 255 0 0 Classification of each Open Space throughout Westminster City of Westminster LANDSCAPE_TYP LANDSCAPE_TYP SmallInteger 2 0 0 Landscape Types are based on the vegetation strata types present within the polygon and proximity to water. The classifications are: 1-Upland Forest 2-Upland Herbaceous 3-Disturbed Area 4-Riparian Forested 5-Riparian Herbaceous 6-Herbaceous Wetland 7-Surface Water 8-Bluegrass Forested 9-Bluegrass Lawn Matrix Design Group 1 9 HYDRO_SYS HYDRO_SYS String 50 0 0 Hydrology type for riparian areas, including drainage channel, stream armored, stream unarmored, or open water. All Upland Forested, Upland Herbaceous, and Herbaceous Wetland landscape types should be NA. Matrix Design Group HAB_TYPE HAB_TYP String 50 0 0 Habitat type which is dependent on landscape types, including the following: -Upland herbaceous landscape type has the following habitat types: Native short-grass prairie, Native mixed-grass prairie, Shrubs, Non-native herbaceous, Prairie dog colony, Former agricultural field -Riparian forested: Cottonwood, Mixed woodland, Willow, Non-native -Herbaceous wetland: Non-native, Native -Surface water: Concrete-lined, Armored, Un-armored -Riparian herbaceous: Non-native, Native -Upland forested, disturbed area, bluegrass lawn, and bluegrass forested do not have habitat subtypes (NA) Matrix Design Group DATE DATE ASSESSED Date 8 1 0 Date polygon was field assessed. City of Westminster Predefined list of valid values from 01/01/2026 to 12/31/2026 -- period of data collection -- to represent date. ASSESSOR ASSESSOR String 255 0 0 Individual who field assessed polygon. City of Westminster Free-form text representing the name of the field assessor for the polygon. VEGCOV_TREE TREE COVER SmallInteger 2 0 0 Total absolute tree cover percentage within polygon. City of Westminster VEGCOV_SHRUB SHRUB COVER Double 8 0 0 Total absolute shrub cover percentage within polygon. City of Westminster VEGCOV_FORB FORB COVER Double 8 0 0 Total absolute forb cover percentage within polygon. City of Westminster VEGCOV_GRASS GRASS COVER Double 8 0 0 Total absolute grass cover percentage within polygon. City of Westminster DOMTREE1 DOMINANT TREE 1 String 255 0 0 Most dominant native or non-native tree species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. City of Westminster Free-form text representing the dominant tree species (common name) of the polygon. DOMTREE1_PCT DOM TREE 1 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of most dominant tree species within polygon. City of Westminster DOMTREE2 DOMINANT TREE 2 String 255 0 0 Second most dominant native or non-native tree species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. City of Westminster Free-form text representing the second most dominant tree species (common name) of the polygon. DOMTREE2_PCT DOM TREE 2 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of second most dominant tree species within polygon. COW DOMSHRUB1 DOMINANT SHRUB 1 String 255 0 0 Most dominant native or non-native shrub species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. COW Free-form text representing the dominant shrub species (common name) of the polygon. DOMSHRUB1_PCT DOM SHRUB PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of most dominant native or non-native shrub species within polygon. COW DOMSHRUB2 DOMINANT SHRUB 2 String 255 0 0 Second most dominant native or non-native shrub species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. COW Free-form text representing the second most dominant shrub species (common name) of the polygon. DOMSHRUB2_PCT DOM SHRUB 2 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent cover of second most dominant native or non-native shrub species within polygon. COW DOMFORB1 DOMINANT FORB 1 String 255 0 0 Most dominant native or non-native forb species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. COW Free-form text representing the dominant forb species (common name) of the polygon. DOMFORB1_PCT DOM FORB 1 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent cover of most dominant native or non-native forb species within polygon. COW DOMFORB2 DOMINANT FORB 2 String 255 0 0 Second most dominant native or non-native forb species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. COW Free-form text representing the second most dominant forb species (common name) of the polygon. DOMFORB2_PCT DOM FORB 2 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of second most dominant native or non-native forb species within polygon. COW DOMGRASS1 DOMINANT GRASS 1 String 255 0 0 Most dominant native or non-native grass species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. COW Free-form text representing the most dominant grass species (common name) of the polygon. DOMGRASS1_PCT DOM GRASS 1 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of most dominant native or non-native grass species within polygon. COW DOMGRASS2 DOMINANT GRASS 2 String 255 0 0 Second most dominant native or non-native grass species within polygon. Noxious species are not listed here but in the DOMNOX fields. COW Free-form text representing the second most dominant grass species (common name) of the polygon. DOMGRASS2_PCT DOM GRASS 2 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of second most dominant native or non-native grass species within polygon. COW DOMNOX1 DOMINANT NOXIOUS 1 String 255 0 0 Most dominant noxious species within polygon. COW Free-form text representing the dominant noxious species (common name) of the polygon. DOMNOX1_PCT DOM NOXIOUS 1 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of most dominant noxious species within polygon. COW DOMNOX2 DOMINANT NOXIOUS 2 String 255 0 0 Second most dominant noxious species within polygon. COW Free-form text representing the second most dominant noxious species (common name) of the polygon. DOMNOX2_PCT DOM NOXIOUS 2 PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Percent absolute cover of second most dominant noxious species within polygon. COW NOXPERCENT TOTAL NOXIOUS PCT CVR Double 8 0 0 Total absolute percent cover of all noxious species found within the polygon. COW DIVERSITY DIVERSITY SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - Landscape contains high species richness (>10 species) and are evenly distributed throughout the landscape. Good (3) - Landscape contains intermediate levels of species richness (6-10) that are mostly evenly distributed throughout the landscape. Fair (2) - Landscape contains low levels of species richness (2-5) and are not very evenly distributed throughout the landscape. Poor (1) - Landscape contains a monoculture of either a native or nonnative species. N/a - Not applicable Note: If species richness is present, but they are not evenly distributed throughout the area, subtract the score by 1 point. COW WILDLIFE WILDLIFE SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - Landscape contains high quality habitat to support multiple wildlife types. Multiple wildlife habitat features are present such as cover, food sources, breeding areas, and protective elements. Good (3) - Landscape contains good quality habitat to support multiple wildlife types. Wildlife habitat features are present but not abundant. Fair (2) - Landscape contains moderate habitat to support some wildlife. Habitat features are limited, and wildlife present not likely to be diverse. Poor (1) - Landscape contains little to no wildlife habitat. Landscape is either degraded or habitat is not present to support wildlife. N/a - Not applicable COW Prairiedoghab Prairie Dog Habitat Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - There is no evidence of prairie dogs. (0% of ground cover is occupied by prairie dogs in area) Good (3) - There is no evidence of an active prairie dog colony, but there are holes and/or other indicators of a former prairie dog colony. (A TES survey may need to be done) (0-10%). Fair (2) - (10-50%) There is evidence of an active prairie dog colony, but it is not widespread. Poor (1) - (50-100%) There is extensive evidence of an active prairie dog colony. COW POLLHABITAT POLLINATOR HABITAT SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - Landscape contains high native forb and/or flowering shrub diversity (>6 species) and density (>20 percent cover). Landscape contains high variety of flower colors, shapes, and sizes. Bloom periods of species present span the growing season. Good (3) - Landscape contains moderate native forb and/or flowering shrub diversity (4-6 species) and density (10-20 percent cover). Landscape contains moderate variety of flower colors, shapes, and sizes. Bloom periods of species present span most of the growing season. Fair (2) - Landscape contains low native forb and/or flowering shrub diversity (<4 species) and density (<10 percent cover). Landscape contains low variety of flower colors, sizes, and shapes. Poor (1) - Landscape does not contain native forbs or flowering shrubs. N/a - Not applicable Note: Annual forb species typically bloom early in the growing season, whereas perennial forb species typically bloom later in the growing season. If both are present, assume the bloom period spans the growing season. COW UndesWoody Undesirable Woody Species Cover Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - No undesirable or non-native/noxious woody species are present. Good (3) - The site is comprised of less than 15% undesirable or non-native/noxious woody species. Fair (2) - The site is comprised of 15-30% undesirable or non-native/noxious woody species, or non-native/noxious woody species are inhibiting growth of 25 to 50 percent of native/desirable tree saplings. Poor (1) - The site is comprised of greater than 30% undesirable or non-native/noxious woody species, or undesirable or non-native/noxious woody species are inhibiting growth of more than 50 percent of native/desirable tree saplings. COW AESTHETICS OVERALL AESTHETICS SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - Landscape is visually appealing and is likely to be visited by the public, including scenic views, clear sightlines, connective trails, high visual diversity (color, texture, form), and complex vegetation communities (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Good (3) - Landscape is moderately visually appealing, with some scenic or visually pleasant areas and visually desirable vegetation. Nearby public are likely to utilize this area but not travel for it. Fair (2) - Landscape is lacking visual appeal and complexity, with low vegetation complexity, uneven distribution of desirable vegetation, limited visual interest (few focal points within open space), and signs of neglect are beginning to show. Poor (1) - Landscape is not visually appealing, with dominance of a single vegetation type, no scenic qualities, visible neglect, and degraded ecological condition present. N/a - Not applicable COW ECOCONNECT ECO CONNECTIVITY SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - The park is highly connected to other elements of the larger park system and/or is in close proximity to trails; presence of outfalls or confluences in riparian or open water systems; similar park features (i.e. trees, shrubs, open water areas); and/or there is a general absence of barriers such as walls, roads, large urbanized areas, and dams. Good (3) - The park is moderately connected to other elements of the larger park system and/or is in relative proximity to trails; similar park features (i.e. trees, shrubs, open water areas); and/or there is a relative absence of barriers such as walls, roads, large urbanized areas, and dams. May have presence of outfalls or confluences in riparian or open water systems. Fair (2) - The park is somewhat connected to other elements of the larger park system and/or has minimal proximity to trails; similar park features (i.e. trees, shrubs, open water areas); and/or there are moderate barriers such as walls, roads, large urbanized areas, and dams. May lack presence of outfalls or confluences in riparian or open water systems. Poor (1) - The park is disconnected to other elements of the larger park system and/or has no proximity to trails; similar park features (i.e. trees, shrubs, open water areas); and/or there are moderate to significant barriers such as walls, roads, large urbanized areas, and dams. Lacks presence of outfalls or confluences in riparian or open water systems. N/a - Not applicable COW USERTRAILS USER DEFINED TRAILS SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - There are no user-defined trails. Good (3) - There are 1-2 user-defined trails and/or the user-defined trails can be integrated into the landscape with minimal impact to the local ecosystems. Fair (2) - There are 2-3 user defined trails that show limited to moderate use and/or any user-defined trail shows signs of moderate landscape degradation. Poor (1) - There are ≥4 user defined trails that show limited to frequent use and/or any user-defined trail shows signs of moderate to severe degradation, including, but not limited to erosion. N/a - Not applicable COW IMPROPUSES IMPROPER USES SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - There is no evidence of improper or unauthorized uses, which may include, but are not limited to: improper trash disposal; debris on trails or walkways, presence of temporary recreational activities; etc. Good (3) - There is some evidence of improper or unauthorized uses, which may include, but are not limited to: improper trash disposal; debris on trails or walkways, presence of temporary recreational activities; etc. These uses are not actively degrading the landscape. Fair (2) - There are moderate improper or unauthorized uses, which may include but are not limited to: improper trash disposal; presence of pet waste; presence of temporary spaces for recreational activities; etc. These uses are causing some degradation of the landscape. Poor (1) - There are significant improper or unauthorized uses, which may include but are not limited to: improper trash disposal; presence of pet waste; presence of temporary or permanent spaces for recreational activities; use of off-road vehicles; presence of improper shelters; many user-defined trails; etc. These uses are causing moderate to severe degradation of the landscape. N/a - Not applicable COW NOXPOP NOXIOUS POPULATION SCORE Double 8 0 0 None (4) - No noxious weeds present. Minor (3) - The site is composed of less than 2% noxious weeds. Moderate (2) - The site is composed of between 2% and 10% noxious weeds. Major (1) - The site is composed of greater than 10% noxious weeds. N/a - Not applicable Note: If Class C weed, score as determined. If Class B = -1 (i.e. Minor becomes Moderate). If Class A = -2 (Minor becomes Major) COW INVASWEED INVASIVE WEED SCORE Double 8 0 0 None (4) - No annual or invasive weeds present. Minor (3) - The site is composed of less than 25% annual or invasive weeds. Moderate (2) - The site is composed of between 25% and 50% annual or invasive weeds. Major (1) - The site is composed of greater than 50% annual or invasive weeds. N/a - Not applicable Note: Only annual/invasive weed populations should be scored for this metric (i.e., kochia, Russian thistle, lambsquarters, pigweed, barnyard grass, green foxtail) COW WATERQUAL WATER QUALITY SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - High water clarity characterized with no visible suspended solids, no evident algal blooms, dense and undisturbed riparian buffer, adequate hydraulic flow, and no trash or debris. Good (3) - Visible suspended solids within the water table, evidence of algal blooms, riparian buffer with little evidence of impairment, adequate hydraulic flow, and little trash and/or debris evident within system. Fair (2) - Visible suspended solids within the water table, evidence of algae blooms, impaired riparian buffer, no hydraulic flow, and trash and/or debris evident within system. Poor (1) - Poor water clarity characterized with high levels of suspended solids, increased presence of algal blooms, no riparian buffer, no hydraulic flow, and high volume of trash and/or debris. N/a - Not applicable Note: Excludes upland typologies COW OPP_RESTORE OPP FOR RESTORATION String 255 0 0 Descriptive metric for surveyors to describe potential restoration opportunities. COW Free-form text representing any potential restoration opportunities for the polygon. No predefined list is set. ROOTDEPTH ROOT DEPTH SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - Average root depth is greater than or equal to 3 feet deep. Good (3) - Average root depth is between 1 to 3 feet deep. Fair (2) - Average root depth is between 0.5 to 1 feet deep. Poor (1) - Average root depth is less than or equal to 1 foot deep. N/a - Not applicable COW ROOTDENSITY ROOT DENSITY SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - 100 to 80 percent of the streambank is occupied by roots of riparian vegetation. Good (3) - 55 to 79 percent of the streambank is occupied by roots of riparian vegetation. Fair (2) - 15 to 54 percent of the streambank is occupied by roots of riparian vegetation. Poor (1) - Less than 14 percent of the streambank is occupied by roots of riparian vegetation. N/a - Not applicable COW BANKANGLE BANK ANGLE SCORE Double 8 0 0 Excellent (4) - Slope gradient is less than or equal to 4:1 (14 degree angle) Good (3) - Slope gradient is between 4:1 and 2:1 (14 degrees to 27 degrees) Fair (2) - Slope gradient is between 2:1 and 1:1 (27 degrees to 45 degrees) Poor (1) - Slope is greater than or equal to 1:1 (45 degrees) or is a cut slope N/a - Not applicable COW FLOWREGIME FLOW REGIME String 255 0 0 Is the stream: Perennial - Water flowing continuously year-round Intermittent - Water flowing seasonally (wet season); typically dry during summer Ephemeral - Typically shallow; normally dry with brief periods of flow in response to rainfall N/a: Not applicable COW BANKHEIGHT BANK HEIGHT String 255 0 0 Choose an area that appears representative of the segment of stream being assessed. Determine the upper limit of the streambank and measure the vertical distance to bankfull, in feet. COW 0 20 BANKMATERIAL BANK MATERIAL String 255 0 0 Choose a representative segment of the stream being assessed and select dominant bank material type: Bedrock - Naturally occurring solid rock foundation Boulders - Large rounded stones Riprap - Coarse aggregate with angular shapes Gravel - Fine to coarse aggregate up to 1 inch in diameter Sand - Coarse well-drained soil Silt/Clay - Fine soils Concrete - Channel completely lined with cement N/a - Not applicable COW Free-form text representing the dominant bank material type. Predefined list of: Bedrock - Naturally occurring solid rock foundation Boulders - Large rounded stones Riprap - Coarse aggregate with angular shapes Gravel - Fine to coarse aggregate up to 1 inch in diameter Sand - Coarse well-drained soil Silt/Clay - Fine soils Concrete - Channel completely lined with cement N/a - Not applicable ECOSERVICES ECOSYSTEM SERVICES String 255 0 0 Choose two most significant ecosystem services from the following list: Erosion Control Nutrient Cycling Flood attenuation Soil Fertility/ Formation Pollination Waste Reduction/ Detoxification Water filtration/ purification Infiltration Primary production Local climate regulation Recreation Aesthetic experience COW Free-form text representing the significant ecosystem services. Predefined list of: Erosion Control Nutrient Cycling Flood attenuation Soil Fertility/ Formation Pollination Waste Reduction/ Detoxification Water filtration/ purification Infiltration Primary production Local climate regulation Recreation Aesthetic experience COMMENTS COMMENTS String 255 0 0 Any additional comments related to the polygon COW Free-form text representing any additional notes about the polygon. No predefined list. TOTALSCORE TOTAL SCORE Double 8 0 0 Total combination score of all metrics COW FUNC_PERCENT FUNC_PERCENT Double 8 0 0 Calculated by summing scores from each assessed parameter and dividing by the total possible score of each polygon (upland vs. riparian) to get a normalized functional score. COW FUNCTION_ FUNCTION String 10 0 0 Calculated by summing scores from each assessed parameter and dividing by the total possible score to get a normalized functional score. Function Score is based on the following thresholds: Excellent (4) - 86-100% Good (3) - 70-85% Fair (2) - 50-69% Poor (1) - <50% COW Mapping_Yr Mapping_Yr String 255 0 0 Year landscape typology data collection was performed COW Free-form text representing the year of mapping (2026). GlobalID GlobalID GlobalID 38 0 0 ID assigned to polygons ESRI Auto-generated identification number for polygons. CUSP_POLYGON CUSP_POLYGON String 255 0 0 Polygons within +/- 3 points of a higher or lower function percent. COW Yes (is a cusp polygon) or no (is not a cusp polygon). CUSP_PRIORITY CUSP_PRIORITY String 255 0 0 Cusp polygons categorized by type of cusp (risk of failing to lower function or ability to increase to higher functions): Excellent to Good: Lower Priority (1) Good to Excellent: Low Priority (1) Good to Fair: High Priority (5) Fair to Good: Moderate Priority (3) Fair to Poor: High Priority (5) Poor to Fair: High Priority (5) COW Level of priority of cusp polygons for maintenance attention. RESTORATION_PCT RESTORATION_PCT Double 8 0 0 Restoration Score is calculated by summing scores from each assessed ecological parameter (DIVERSITY SCORE, WILDLIFE SCORE, POLLINATOR HABITAT SCORE, UNDESIRABLE WOODY SCORE, NOXIOUS POPULATION SCORE, and INVASIVE WEED SCORE) and dividing by the total possible score of each polygon to get a normalized restoration functional score. COW DOM_TREE_1_OTHER DOM TREE 1 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Trees COW DOM_TREE_2_OTHER DOM TREE 2 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Trees COW DOMINANT_NOXIOUS_2_OTHER DOMINANT NOXIOUS 2 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Noxious Weeds COW DOMINANT_NOXIOUS_1_OTHER DOMINANT NOXIOUS 1 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Noxious Weeds COW DOMINANT_GRASS_2_OTHER DOMINANT GRASS 2 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Grasses COW DOMINANT_GRASS_1_OTHER DOMINANT GRASS 1 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Grasses COW DOMINANT_FORB_2_OTHER DOMINANT FORB 2 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Forbs COW DOMINANT_SHRUB_2_OTHER DOMINANT SHRUB 2 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Shrubs COW DOMINANT_FORB_1_OTHER DOMINANT FORB 1 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Forbs COW DOMINANT_SHRUB_1_OTHER DOMINANT SHRUB 1 OTHER String 256 0 0 Species that are not within the list of Dominant Shrubs COW RESTORATION_FUNCTION RESTORATION_FUNCTION String 255 0 0 Restoration Function transforms the RESTORATION_PCT to fit within the buckets of: Poor: <50 Fair: 50-69 Good: 70-85 Excellent: >85 COW OBJECTID_OLD OBJECTID_OLD Double 8 0 0 Original Object ID COW RESTORATION_TOTALSCORE RESTORATION_TOTALSCORE Double 8 0 0 Total summation of DIVERSITY SCORE, WILDLIFE SCORE, POLLINATOR HABITAT SCORE, NOXIOUS POPULATION SCORE, and INVASIVE WEED SCORE COW RESTORATION_PC RESTORATION_PC Double 8 0 0 Total possible score of DIVERSITY SCORE, WILDLIFE SCORE, POLLINATOR HABITAT SCORE, NOXIOUS POPULATION SCORE, and INVASIVE WEED SCORE COW INVASIVE_GRASS_SCORE INVASIVE_GRASS_SCORE Double 8 0 0 Presence of crested wheatgrass and/or smooth brome as dominant species within a polygon. COW TRANSECTCOVER TRANSECTCOVER Double 8 0 0 Average of total overall vegetation cover (0-100%) within transect collected within each polygon. COW TRANSECTNATCOV TRANSECTNATCOV Double 8 0 0 Average of total native vegetation cover within the transects within the polygon. COW TRANSECTNNCOV TRANSECTNNCOV Double 8 0 0 Average of total non-native vegetation cover within the transects collected within the polygon COW PRIORITZATIONTOTALSCORE PRIORITZATIONTOTALSCORE Double 8 0 0 Total score of prioritization list created for COW for each polygon to understand highest priority areas. COW Shape_Length Shape_Length Double 8 0 0 Length of feature in internal units. Esri Positive real numbers that are automatically generated. Shape_Area Shape_Area Double 8 0 0 Area of feature in internal units squared. Esri Positive real numbers that are automatically generated. 20261001 Arian Hampel City of Westminster Open Spaces Arian Hampel Westminster Colorado 80031 US 3036582192 Process step data for data cleanup and analysis Computer mapping . 2026-09-30T00:00:00 measures the spatial extents of different landscape types throughout Westminster's open spaces. Measures the spatial extents of different landscape types throughout Westminster's open spaces.